Perak Mufti: Boycotting Goes Against Islamic Principles of Justice

Perak Mufti Datuk Seri Wan Zahidi Wan Teh has stated that accusing a party of insulting Islam must be proven before considering a boycott. In a press conference on May 3 in Ipoh, Perak, the mufti emphasized that the crucial element of criminal intent, known as "alqasdul jinaei" in Islamic law, cannot be proven through direct evidence, but rather through confession or circumstantial evidence.

Why this matters: This statement has significant implications for interfaith relations and social harmony, as it cautions against hasty judgments and promotes a more nuanced approach to addressing perceived insults to Islam. By emphasizing the importance of evidence and due process, the mufti's comments can help mitigate religious tensions and promote a more peaceful coexistence among communities.

Wan Zahidi's comments come in the context of the recent controversy surrounding KK Mart's sale of stockings bearing the word 'Allah'. The mufti said that the accusation of insulting Islam has not been proven in this case. He stressed that boycotting a specific community is inconsistent with Islamic teachings and the traditions, or "sunnah", of Prophet Muhammad SAW, who never boycotted the Quraysh tribe despite their opposition to Islam.

"This element [criminal intent] cannot be proven through 'syahadah' (direct evidence). It can only be proven through confession or through 'qarainul ahwal' (circumstantial evidence)," Wan Zahidi explained. He emphasized that Islamic outreach requires a peaceful atmosphere and harmonious relationships among communities of diverse religions.

The mufti noted that issuing his statement took considerable time due to the need for thorough research and references on the matter. "Whether it sparks controversy or not is up to individuals. We follow the teachings of Allah and Prophet Muhammad SAW; I am convinced and obligated to convey this," he stated firmly.

Key Takeaways

• Perak Mufti Wan Zahidi emphasizes need for evidence before accusing a party of insulting Islam.
• Criminal intent must be proven through confession or circumstantial evidence, not direct evidence.
• Boycotting a community is inconsistent with Islamic teachings and Prophet Muhammad's traditions.
• Islamic outreach requires a peaceful atmosphere and harmonious relationships among diverse religions.
• Accusations of insulting Islam must be substantiated with evidence before considering actions like boycotts.