Israel's Ambassador Suggests Possible Withdrawal from UN Due to 'Perceived Bias'

Israel's UN ambassador suggests withdrawing from the UN due to perceived bias, but acknowledges it would benefit Israel's enemies, calling for reforms instead to address the "deep rot" within the organization.

author-image
Hadeel Hashem
New Update
Israel's UN Ambassador Suggests Possible Withdrawal Due to Perceived Bias

Israel's UN Ambassador Suggests Possible Withdrawal Due to Perceived Bias

Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, has suggested that the country may consider withdrawing from the UN due to what he sees as hypocrisy, double standards, and a fundamental problem within the organization. Erdan's comments come amid ongoing tensions between Israel and the UN, with the ambassador citing numerous challenges he has faced during his tenure.

Erdan pointed to incidents such as pro-Hamas protesters disrupting his speeches, the UN's downplaying of Hamas' crimes, and a perceived whitewash of UNRWA's involvement with Hamas by a UN commission. He argued that these instances demonstrate a bias against Israel within the UN system.

However, Erdan acknowledged that leaving the UN would ultimately benefit Israel's enemies and called for reform in UN-Israel relations and new rules for UN agencies operating in Israel. "Leaving the UN is not the solution, as it would give Israel's enemies an advantage," he stated. Instead, he advocated for reforming the UN's relations with Israel and its operations in the Middle East, particularly in the wake of the current conflict.

Why this matters: Israel's potential withdrawal from the UN would have significant geopolitical implications and could further isolate the country on the international stage. The situation highlights the ongoing tensions and complexities in the relationship between Israel and the UN, with accusations of bias and double standards from both sides.

Erdan suggested that if the proposed reforms fail, the option of withdrawing from the UN may need to be considered as a last resort. He emphasized the need for concrete action, such as the UN Security Council condemning Iran's recent attack on Israel and designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization. As the conflict continues, the international community will be closely watching the developments in Israel's relationship with the UN and the potential consequences of any further escalation.

Key Takeaways

  • Israel's UN ambassador suggests withdrawing from UN due to perceived bias and hypocrisy.
  • Erdan cites incidents like pro-Hamas protesters disrupting speeches and UNRWA whitewashing.
  • Leaving UN would benefit Israel's enemies, so Erdan calls for UN-Israel relations reform.
  • Israel's withdrawal would have significant geopolitical implications and further isolate the country.
  • Erdan says withdrawal may be considered if proposed reforms fail, emphasizes need for UN action.